GPT 5.4 AI approved (VS Code Suite)

Why the software was built

Chronological Timeline Feb 2024 - June 4th, 2026

This timeline will be expanded over the coming weeks into a fuller public record of what I say has happened to me, and the documents and exhibits referenced here will be published on this page. I am putting this into the open because I believe it is in the public interest to do so. I no longer feel safe leaving it buried behind private correspondence, delay, or silence. The evidence will be released here in the interests of openness and transparency, and because I believe public scrutiny is now one of the only protections I have against further retaliation while the truth is being resisted, denied, or concealed.

Over the past 18 months I have documented what I describe as repeated mistreatment by police, prosecutors, and other public-facing actors. I have kept dated notes and timestamps because I believed, from early on, that the record itself would matter. My severe mental health difficulties were known to the courts, solicitors, police and prosecution, yet I believe decisions continued to be taken without proper regard to that context, including what I say was a threat-to-kill allegation that, in my view, sat uneasily with later statements from a senior campaign figure and with a June 2025 forensic psychiatric assessment diagnosing cPTSD. I further allege that a second charge, added in March 2025, relied on an MP's email address in a way I believe was misleading. I wrote repeatedly to the court and court officers about these matters, but I do not believe those concerns were properly addressed. I also allege that the judicial handling itself became unstable, beginning with what I say was a move to a district judge at Westminster two minutes before a magistrates' hearing at Great Yarmouth in August 2024, followed by Judge 2 from September 2024 to November 2024, Judge 3 from February to November 2024, and Judge 4 from November 2025 to ongoing. The pressure described in this timeline contributed to self-harm in desperation. In my view, there were repeated attempts to discredit me, isolate me, and rely on material I say was inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete.

With what I understand to be only two months before trial and with the court still not asking for my defence witnesses, I remain concerned about whether the process will be fair. Nothing on this page is intended to influence jurors, witnesses, or the court; my purpose is to preserve a dated record of what I say has happened and explain why I built this software. There has still been no ruling on the charge I dispute and, more seriously, I allege that body-worn camera footage from the initial arrest may have been edited, incomplete, or otherwise presented in a way that omitted me speaking about the ongoing genocide by israel, Britain, and the USA, as well as wider concerns I have raised about foreign influence within the British judicial system, and that omitted material I say supported my SAR-1 complaint from September 2024.

That is why I had to build this software. I did not build it as an abstract project or a technical exercise. I built it because I believed it was necessary, in the public interest, to create a way of bringing the truth back into view through timing drift, camera geometry, signal fusion, and the math needed to make manipulation visible.

This page will expand with my allegations, documents, and dated record concerning what I describe as cultic behaviour, corruption concerns, alleged multi million pound fraud, questioned signatures, disputed documents, shell companies, ghost companies, and dormant Companies House filings that, in my account, connect to a large solicitors firm in Lowestoft. Publicly available downloadable documents and the fuller timeline are coming soon.

Chronology

Abuse of Process Timeline

A dated record of filings, incidents, escalations, and responses that led to the creation of FrameAudit and to the publication of this account in the public interest. This page sets out my account; where allegations are made, they are allegations I say are supported by dated notes, recordings and documents I intend to publish, subject to redaction and legal review. It is not intended to invite interference with any ongoing proceedings, witnesses, jurors, or the court.

Solicitor allegations
Feb 2024
Mar 2024
Apr 2024
May 2024
Jun 2024
Jul 2024
SAR 1
Aug 2024
SAR 2
Sep 2024
Oct 2024
Nov 2024
Dec 2024
Jan 2025
Mar 2025
May 2025
Jun 2025
Jul 2025
Aug 2025
Sep 2025
SAR 3
SAR 4
Nov 2025
Jan 2026
Feb 2026
31 Mar 2026
  1. Feb 2024: Opening point of the dated record and, in my account, the beginning of the Judge 3 range running from February to November 2024.
  2. Mar 2024: Earlier chronology still to be expanded from the dated record.
  3. Apr 2024: Earlier chronology still to be expanded from the dated record.
  4. May 2024: Earlier chronology still to be expanded from the dated record.
  5. Jun 2024: Earlier chronology still to be expanded from the dated record.
  6. Jul 2024: The firm I refer to as solicitor 1 begins the period I say runs from July 2024 to November 2024.
  7. SAR 1: First SAR in August 2024.
  8. Aug 2024: I allege the matter was moved to a district judge at Westminster two minutes before a magistrates' hearing at Great Yarmouth, while the period of solicitor-related allegations I describe also begins during the solicitor 1 phase.
  9. SAR 2: September 2024 welfare-check ambush incident and second SAR.
  10. Sep 2024: Judge 2 period begins, running from September 2024 to November 2024.
  11. Oct 2024: Ongoing Judge 2 period, continuing solicitor-related allegations in my account, and ongoing representation by the firm I describe as solicitor 1.
  12. Nov 2024: The period of solicitor-related allegations I describe closes, Judge 2 period ends, the Judge 3 range I describe also reaches November 2024, and the solicitor 1 period ends.
  13. Dec 2024: Post-turnover phase continues beyond the August to November 2024 period.
  14. Jan 2025: Further dated event still to be expanded from the record.
  15. Mar 2025: The firm I refer to as solicitor 2 begins the period I say runs from March 2025 to August 2025.
  16. May 2025: The solicitor 2 period is ongoing.
  17. Jun 2025: The solicitor 2 period is ongoing.
  18. Jul 2025: The solicitor 2 period is ongoing.
  19. Aug 2025: The solicitor 2 period runs through August 2025, following the solicitor 1 period from July 2024 to November 2024.
  20. Sep 2025: Final pre-October phase before SAR 3 and SAR 4.
  21. SAR 3: Third SAR in October 2025.
  22. SAR 4: Fourth SAR in October 2025.
  23. Nov 2025: Judge 4 begins in November 2025 and remains ongoing.
  24. Jan 2026: Proceedings remain ongoing under Judge 4.
  25. Feb 2026: Proceedings remain ongoing under Judge 4.
  26. 31 Mar 2026: Current point in the dated record. Proceedings remain ongoing under Judge 4.

Judge changes

The judge sequence I describe now forms part of the chronology.

  • Judge 1: In August 2024, I allege the matter was moved to a district judge at Westminster two minutes before a magistrates' hearing at Great Yarmouth, in what I describe as cooperation between my solicitor and the prosecution. In my account, the solicitor involved was then a duty solicitor and senior partner at the firm I describe as solicitor 1.
  • Judge 2: In my account, September 2024 to November 2024.
  • Judge 3: In my account, February to November 2024.
  • Judge 4: In my account, November 2025 to ongoing.

Solicitor changes

The solicitor sequence I describe is visible here without reading the full event key.

  • Solicitor 1: In my account, the firm I describe as solicitor 1 acted from July 2024 to November 2024.
  • Solicitor 2: In my account, the firm I describe as solicitor 2 acted from March 2025 to August 2025.