Standard review
3 to 5 business days
Best starting point for serious disputes where the matter needs a structured review and a review-ready delivery package.
Pricing and delivery
Choose the review path that matches the stakes, deadline, and scrutiny level of the matter.
FrameAudit is priced first as a specialist review engagement for corporate investigations, civil litigation, claims involving governments or police, public inquiries, insurers, regulators, and serious verification teams. Each offer includes a visible delivery window so buyers can judge pace, scope, and review depth alongside price.
Urgent review
24 to 48 hours
Priority scheduling for injunction work, fast-moving civil matters, internal escalation, or deadline-driven public scrutiny when practical.
Software access
Same day
Private provisioning path for repeat users who already understand the workflow and want it inside their own handling process.
Best starting point
FrameAudit Case Review
GBP 950 to GBP 1,500
Best for a first engagement where legal teams, investigators, journalists, or corporate stakeholders need a structured technical review without first learning the software.
- Confidential intake and scope review
- Multi-signal analysis and analyst review
- Ranked review windows with timestamps
- Executive summary for counsel or decision-makers
- Review-ready evidence bundle for handoff
High-priority review
Complex or Urgent Case Review
GBP 1,500 to GBP 2,500+
For urgent matters, larger files, complex disclosure questions, or disputes where the recording is already central to the case.
- Everything in Case Review
- Priority scheduling and delivery handling
- Deeper review pass where needed
- Expanded supporting artifacts and reporting
- Better fit for tribunal, inquiry, or escalated internal matters
Follow-on product
Investigator Edition
GBP 199 to GBP 499
For repeat users who already understand the workflow and want local execution through the Windows app or CLI inside their own review environment.
- Windows build
- Desktop launcher and CLI
- Official bundle workflow
- Documentation and examples
Windows delivery is handled privately after suitability review. Integrity hashes and verification materials are supplied directly with approved delivery.
Typical matters
Examples of disputes that fit this review path.
- Police misconduct footage, arrest video disputes, or body-worn and custody-suite CCTV challenges.
- Civil claims against police forces, councils, ministries, prisons, or other public bodies where recordings are central.
- Corporate workplace incidents, misconduct allegations, site access disputes, and internal investigation evidence packs.
- Insurer fraud review, claims disputes, staged-event concerns, and contested incident recordings.
- Journalistic, NGO, or public-inquiry matters where a reviewable chain of reasoning is needed.
What drives price
Scope changes more with dispute pressure than with raw runtime.
- Urgency: injunctions, hearings, executive deadlines, and disclosure timetables compress the delivery window.
- Complexity: multiple clips, unclear provenance, cross-checking needs, and deeper reporting increase review depth.
- Stake: matters touching litigation, public scrutiny, discipline, or reputation usually need a stronger handoff package.
- Context: better case briefing and clearer timestamps reduce friction and improve turnaround.
- Repeat use: once the workflow is understood, Investigator Edition becomes the lower-friction follow-on option.
Delivery flow
How the review moves from intake to bundle delivery.
The key timing variables are urgency, dispute pressure, file complexity, and required review depth. Those affect quote and delivery window more than the software license itself.
Submit case brief
Provide a short description of the recording, what is disputed, who is involved, and the desired outcome.
Confirm scope and urgency
Fit, delivery speed, review depth, and handoff expectations are checked before the final quote and window are confirmed.
Run and review analysis
The recording is processed through the selected workflow and the resulting review points are checked before the package is finalized.
Assemble official bundle
Summary, findings, artifacts, fingerprints, and checksums are packaged into the delivery set for counsel, decision-makers, or investigators.
Deliver review package
The client receives a structured package designed for actual handoff, not just an internal test result or black-box score.
Next step
Choose the review path, then open confidential intake.
If the recording may sit inside litigation, public scrutiny, a disciplinary matter, or a major corporate dispute, start with the review path first. If the workflow is already understood internally, use the Windows build as the follow-on offer.