Continuity and Frame Structure
Examines frame-to-frame behaviour for discontinuities, drift, repeated or missing visual information, and structural breaks that may suggest edits, interruption, or unstable capture.
Institutional evidence review
FrameAudit
Multi-signal intelligence for contested footage in high-stakes civil, corporate, and public-interest matters.
FrameAudit is designed for corporate investigations teams, claimant-side civil litigators challenging governments or police, public inquiries, oversight bodies, insurers, and court-facing matters that need a defensible assessment of contested recordings.
FrameAudit is a multi-signal review system that uses OCR drift, dense frame metrics, motion flow, camera geometry, audio-spectrum analysis, and weighted anomaly scoring to identify and package review windows that may warrant closer scrutiny. Built from necessity rather than theory, it is designed to test contested recording narratives and produce a reviewable bundle that counsel, tribunals, oversight bodies, and serious institutional buyers can actually work from.
Windows delivery is now provided privately after intake review. Integrity materials and verification hashes are furnished directly with approved delivery.
Access model
Private distribution
Windows delivery
Request investigator build
Verification
Checksums supplied privately at delivery
Confidential intake
Local-first evidence handling
Multi-signal review
Bundle ready for counsel or tribunal
Why this exists
When footage is disputed, visuals alone are not enough.
A recording can look believable while still containing possible continuity breaks, timing drift, compression inconsistencies, or structural anomalies. FrameAudit examines how a recording behaves across time, structure, motion, and encoding, then packages that assessment into a repeatable review bundle suited to litigation, internal investigations, regulatory scrutiny, and public-interest disputes.
Multi-signal engine
Corroborated signals, not one opaque score.
The product is strongest when it explains how a finding is supported. Each signal contributes to a reviewable consistency profile rather than a black-box verdict.
Motion and Scene Behaviour
Checks whether camera movement, subject motion, and scene transitions behave like a naturally continuous recording, helping surface jumps, resets, or shifts that do not fit the surrounding footage.
Timeline Consistency
Compares sequence order, pacing, timestamps, and adjacent signals across the review window to test whether the clip's internal timing remains coherent from one moment to the next.
Compression Irregularities
Looks for changes in encoding pressure, artifact patterns, and bitrate behaviour that may indicate recompression, inserted segments, or other intervals that deserve closer review.
Audio Continuity
Uses supporting audio behaviour such as ambience, speech flow, and spectral continuity to strengthen or weaken a review window and test whether the sound track behaves consistently with the picture.
Spatial Persistence
Tracks whether visual anchors, geometry, and scene layout persist the way a continuous clip should, helping highlight intervals where alignment, position, or structure shifts unexpectedly.
Review bundle
A result bundle built for review, not just a score.
FrameAudit produces a structured package designed for handoff, archiving, and follow-up review. You receive a structured review package, not just a vague output.
- Executive summary
- DOCX report for delivery
- Ranked anomaly windows
- Findings JSON
- Source fingerprint and tool record
- Checksums
- Supporting artifacts and logs
Commercial path
Start with case review. Move to software when the workflow fits.
Disputed video evidence is rarely a casual purchase decision. Service-first pricing gives buyers clarity before self-serve tooling, and each offer has a clear delivery window so clients know what pace to expect.
Best starting point
FrameAudit Case Review
GBP 950 to GBP 1,500
Best for disputed footage that needs a structured technical review without forcing the client to learn the software first.
- Intake and scope review
- Multi-signal analysis run
- Ranked anomaly windows
- Executive summary
- Review-ready evidence bundle
High-priority review
Complex or Urgent Case Review
GBP 1,500 to GBP 2,500+
For urgent matters, larger files, complex review questions, or higher-stakes handoff requirements.
- Everything in Case Review
- Priority scheduling
- Deeper review pass when needed
- Expanded supporting artifacts
Follow-on product
Investigator Edition
GBP 199 to GBP 499
For users who already understand the workflow and want local execution through the Windows app or CLI.
- Windows build
- Desktop launcher and CLI
- Official bundle workflow
- Documentation and examples
Commercial value
FrameAudit can be framed as a serious commercial asset, not just a technical prototype.
The package now has a cleaner commercial story: a strategic asset value band, a replacement-cost case, and a service-led revenue workflow aimed at institutional, litigation, and public-interest buyers.
Indicative strategic asset value
GBP 150k to GBP 500kA realistic current value band for the package as a private strategic asset before broader market traction.
Stronger strategic buyer fit
GBP 350k to GBP 750kPossible with the right institutional buyer who values the workflow, delivery path, and buyer positioning.
Illustrative annual workflow revenue
GBP 66k to GBP 180k+A service-led lane is already visible through standard reviews, urgent reviews, and follow-on software access.
Open the full commercial value brief.
See the dedicated value page for indicative strategic value bands, replacement-cost framing, workflow economics, and market context against established vendors.
Indicative commercial framing only. Not a guaranteed sale price, revenue outcome, or forensic conclusion.
Proof
See a real finding package.
FrameAudit is designed to show where the recording may deserve closer review, how strongly the signals align, and what supporting material was generated for that interval.
00:16:58.5 - 00:17:02.5
High-priority review window
Support channels: continuity, timing, compression
Artifacts: review clip, summary entry, window report
Corporate Investigations
Civil Claims Against Police or Government
Courts, Tribunals, and Public Inquiries
Insurers, Oversight Bodies, and Serious Verification Teams
Who this is for
Best fit for high-stakes buyers who need a reviewable record.
- Large companies handling internal investigations, misconduct allegations, disputes, or reputational incidents.
- Claimant-side civil teams pursuing actions against governments, police forces, or other public bodies.
- External counsel, expert-support teams, courts, tribunals, and public inquiries dealing with contested recordings.
- Insurers, risk teams, regulators, and oversight bodies that need a structured evidence package rather than a raw model score.
- Journalists, NGOs, and verification units working on serious public-interest matters where chain of reasoning matters.
Who it is not for
Not designed for low-context or mass-volume use.
- Casual consumer disputes where the issue does not justify a structured technical review.
- Teams seeking instant automated verdicts without analyst review, scope confirmation, or case context.
- Bulk moderation or high-volume social screening workflows where speed matters more than defensible reporting.
- Matters where no original recording, timeline, or dispute context can be supplied for review.
- Buyers looking to replace a full forensic laboratory outright rather than secure a focused disputed-video workflow.
Get started
Open a confidential review before disputed-recording issues become a disclosure problem.
Start with pricing and delivery, then email TeamMohamed@proton.me with a short case brief, the recording details, and the deadline you are working to.